US 12,525,093
Granted United States PatentUS 12,525,093 B2SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ON-LINE SIMULATED AND NON-SIMULATED GAMBLING

US 12,525,093 — Rating methodology

Every rating is driven by the evidence records

This presentation does not publish numerical correspondence scores. A numerical score would imply a mathematical level of infringement, legal exposure or claim satisfaction. Each platform is placed in a qualitative band, and the cited evidence supporting that band is shown on the relevant entity page.

Granted patent core — US 12,525,093

GrantedUS 12,525,093
  1. Real-world events
  2. Odds
  3. Gambling credits
  4. Zero / minimal-value pseudo-currency
  5. Economic mode monitoring
  6. Wagering threshold
  7. Data update reduction
  8. Reduced network transfer
  9. Limited results delivered
View granted United States patentView USPTO recordView Claim 1View Claim 10View Claim 19US 12,525,093 B2 — primary source benchmark

Bands

The qualitative rating bands used throughout

Very High

High

Medium-High

Medium

Medium-Low

Low

Not Established

Technical Verification Required

Independent claim correspondence

Correspondence identified across the 15 mandatory limitations of Claim 1 is the primary driver of the band.

Dependent claim relevance

Correspondence across the 8 dependent claim features refines, but does not establish, the band.

Evidence strength

The level and depth of the cited sources is assessed and reported as a separate band, never merged into the correspondence band.

These categories reflect the strength of publicly identified functional correspondence with elements of the Granted United States Patent. They do not represent infringement conclusions, legal probabilities or a determination that every limitation of an independent claim is satisfied.

Ladder

Correspondence values applied to each element

GradeMeaning applied
Direct public evidenceThe company's own documentation expressly describes functionality corresponding to the claim element.
Strong functional correspondenceThe company publicly demonstrates functionality relevant to the claim element, without expressly describing it in corresponding terms.
Partial correspondencePart of the claim element is publicly observable; the remainder is not established by the material reviewed.
Technical verification requiredConsumer-facing functionality is visible but backend implementation cannot be established from public material.
No public evidence identifiedNo public material reviewed describes functionality corresponding to this claim element.

Sources

Evidence levels and how they are read

Level 1

Level 1 — Primary

Official company terms, house rules, help centre, product and developer documentation, investor relations and corporate announcements.

Level 2

Level 2 — Government / regulatory

SEC filings, gaming regulators, court documents, official registers, USPTO.

Level 3

Level 3 — High-quality secondary

Major financial and business publications.

Level 4

Level 4 — Other secondary

Used only where primary material could not be located. Affiliate gambling sites are excluded where an official source exists.

All cited sources were reviewed as at 23 August 2026. Where a source publishes its own effective or last-updated date, that date is displayed alongside the citation.

Applied

Bands across the reviewed entities

EntityClaim 1DependentsEvidence qualityUnestablishedPublic correspondence
Fliff10 of 15 elements evidencedPartially evidenced23/23 Level 15 of 15Very High
ReBet10 of 15 elements evidencedPartially evidenced15/15 Level 15 of 15Very High
Sportzino10 of 15 elements evidencedPartially evidenced15/16 Level 15 of 15High
Stake.com8 of 15 elements evidencedPartially evidenced12/12 Level 17 of 15Medium-High
Stake.us6 of 15 elements evidencedPartially evidenced11/12 Level 19 of 15Medium-High
DraftKings9 of 15 elements evidencedPartially evidenced17/18 Level 16 of 15Medium
BetMGM8 of 15 elements evidencedPartially evidenced10/13 Level 17 of 15Medium
FanDuel9 of 15 elements evidencedPartially evidenced17/18 Level 16 of 15Medium
Fanatics Sportsbook6 of 15 elements evidencedPartially evidenced11/12 Level 19 of 15Medium-Low
Caesars Sportsbook8 of 15 elements evidencedPartially evidenced8/13 Level 17 of 15Medium-Low

What a rating is not

A correspondence band reflects publicly observable functional correspondence with the granted claims on the evidence reviewed. It is not a finding of infringement, not a legal opinion, and not a statement that any independent claim is satisfied. Every entity in the table above has mandatory limitations of Claim 1 that remain unestablished on the public record.