Competitor patent portfolios
What do the target companies already own?
Portfolio review is conducted against published patent records. Where no comparable granted right is located, that is recorded as a review outcome, not as an assertion about what a company does or does not own.
Granted patent core — US 12,525,093
GrantedUS 12,525,093- Real-world events
- Odds
- Gambling credits
- Zero / minimal-value pseudo-currency
- Economic mode monitoring
- Wagering threshold
- Data update reduction
- Reduced network transfer
- Limited results delivered
View granted United States patentView USPTO recordView Claim 1View Claim 10View Claim 19US 12,525,093 B2 — primary source benchmark
Review scope
Technology areas reviewed for each target
- sportsbook technology
- virtual currency
- simulated wagering
- free-to-play sports prediction
- sports event markets
- gaming credits
- dual-currency platforms
- responsible gambling
- practice betting
- player accounts
- real-time event feeds
- network optimisation
- data delivery
- wager settlement
- social sportsbook
- gamification
By company
Portfolio review
ReBet
Research pending- Relevant patents identified
- Research pending
- What those patents appear to protect
- Research pending
- What US 12,525,093 adds
- A granted position covering combined simulated / non-simulated wagering with mode-responsive data-transfer control
- Potential portfolio overlap
- Research pending
- Potential portfolio gap
- Research pending
- Review outcome language
- No directly comparable granted patent was identified in the reviewed public portfolio.
Language standard
Where a search does not locate a comparable right, the finding is expressed as “no directly comparable granted patent was identified in the reviewed public portfolio”. It is never expressed as a statement that a company does not own the technology.