Granted United States PatentUS 12,525,093 B2SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ON-LINE SIMULATED AND NON-SIMULATED GAMBLING

Patent control scenarios

What if a competitor controls the patent?

Each scenario describes the position that could arise if the named operator held the granted patent. Nothing here states that any company infringes, or that ownership would prevent competitor activity.

Granted patent core — US 12,525,093

GrantedUS 12,525,093
  1. Real-world events
  2. Odds
  3. Gambling credits
  4. Zero / minimal-value pseudo-currency
  5. Economic mode monitoring
  6. Wagering threshold
  7. Data update reduction
  8. Reduced network transfer
  9. Limited results delivered

The asset

A single granted position sitting among nine market participants

Granted United States patent

US 12,525,093

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ON-LINE SIMULATED AND NON-SIMULATED GAMBLING

Scenario

If DraftKings controls the Granted United States Patent

Commercial strategic assessment only.

Granted United States Patent

US 12,525,093 B2

  1. DraftKings — Potential Acquirer
  2. Competitive landscape

Surrounding competitors

  • ReBet
  • Fliff
  • Sportzino
  • Stake ecosystem
  • BetMGM
  • FanDuel
  • Fanatics Sportsbook
  • Caesars Sportsbook

Acquisition would place a granted United States patent concerning simulated/non-simulated wagering architecture, pseudo-currency operation and data-transfer control within DraftKings’s IP portfolio.

Strategic assessment

Potential strategic consequences

  • stronger patent portfolio positioning
  • additional licensing options
  • potential cross-licensing value
  • additional negotiating leverage
  • increased freedom to invest in related product architecture
  • a strategic asset relevant to competitors developing similar functionality
  • potential future enforcement options, subject to legal and technical analysis

Public correspondence

Medium

Defensive strategic value

Medium-High

Competitive / portfolio value

Very High

Scenario limits

These scenarios describe potential commercial positions only. They do not state that any company infringes, that enforcement would succeed, or that control of the patent would prevent any competitor from operating. Any such outcome would be subject to claim construction, technical verification and legal analysis.