Methodology
How this mapping was prepared
The presentation is intended to be independently checkable by general counsel, chief IP counsel or outside patent attorneys. Every mapped element is traceable to a public source or expressly recorded as unverified.
Granted patent core — US 12,525,093
GrantedUS 12,525,093- Real-world events
- Odds
- Gambling credits
- Zero / minimal-value pseudo-currency
- Economic mode monitoring
- Wagering threshold
- Data update reduction
- Reduced network transfer
- Limited results delivered
Principles
Analytical standards applied
Two scores, never merged
Publicly observable alignment to US 12,525,093 and commercial priority are reported separately. Neither is an infringement probability and they are not combined into a single figure.
Public, company-owned sources first
Terms of use, official rules and help-centre documentation rank above marketing pages, which rank above investor disclosures and reputable third-party reporting.
Element-level mapping
Every observation is tied to a specific claim element rather than to the patent as a whole.
Separate products stay separate
Where an operator runs distinct products, evidence is recorded per product and no combined-system conclusion is drawn.
Backend limitations flagged, not assumed
Limitations that depend on server behaviour are recorded as requiring technical verification, including where front-end functionality appears closely related.
No legal conclusions
The material is prepared for technical and commercial evaluation. No conclusion is drawn regarding infringement.
Language
Terminology discipline
Language used
- Publicly observable functional alignment
- Potential claim relevance
- Public evidence indicates functional correspondence
- This element appears relevant to Claim X
- Technical implementation requires further verification
- No conclusion is drawn regarding infringement
- Certain backend implementation details are not publicly observable
- The mapping is provided for commercial and technical evaluation
Language not used
- Statements that a company infringes the patent
- References to patent infringement by a named party
- Assertions that a company is using the patented technology
- Statements that a company cannot lawfully operate its product
- Statements that a company is violating the patent
Exclusions
Analytical steps deliberately not taken
- Fake percentages or invented confidence figures
- Invented proprietary backend architecture
- Assertions that a company uses data throttling without a source demonstrating it
- Inferring server architecture merely from the appearance of an app
- Combining Stake.us and Stake.com as though necessarily a single accused product
- Treating non-withdrawable bonus credit as automatically satisfying the zero / minimal-value pseudo-currency limitation
- Prominent use of competitor logos or unnecessary copied screenshots
Scope
Standing disclaimer
Applies to the whole presentation