Architectural consequence
How central are the claimed elements to the product?
This page does not advise on how any claim element might be avoided. It assesses, conceptually and commercially, how significant each functional area appears to be within current product propositions.
Granted patent core — US 12,525,093
GrantedUS 12,525,093- Real-world events
- Odds
- Gambling credits
- Zero / minimal-value pseudo-currency
- Economic mode monitoring
- Wagering threshold
- Data update reduction
- Reduced network transfer
- Limited results delivered
Grading
Consequence levels
Low consequence
Feature may potentially be substituted without materially changing the product proposition.
Moderate consequence
A change may affect customer experience or internal architecture.
High consequence
The relevant functionality appears central to the product proposition and significant redesign could potentially affect the business model.
Unknown
Backend implementation not publicly observable.
Assessment
Functional areas assessed
Play-money mode
HighAppears central to social sportsbook propositions.
Dual-currency model
HighUnderpins the customer proposition on several platforms.
Real-world event wagering
HighThe core market offering across every target.
Bonus-credit mode
ModeratePromotional mechanics may be varied commercially.
Simulated / non-simulated transition
HighMode switching is architecturally significant where present.
Real-time data
ModerateFeed sourcing is typically vendor-supplied and substitutable.
Rankings
LowLeaderboards are presentational and readily substituted.
Multi-event wagering
ModerateParlay-style functionality is widely implemented.
Data-transfer management
UnknownBackend behaviour is not publicly observable.
Scope of this assessment